Overall Objectives The objectives of your discussion section should include the following: The three moves allow your readers to evaluate their interest in your paper and play a significant role in the paper review process, determining your paper reviewers. These authors showed that dietary polyphenols in fruits and vegetables decrease the size and number of atherosclerotic lesions.
One of the microstructure revision strategies frequently used during writing center consultations is to read the paper aloud [ 17 ]. Pleasant music overcomes the loss of awareness in patients with visual neglect. Other trials of CBT with young people have tended to concentrate on managing the anxiety or discomfort experienced when undertaking exposure and response prevention, e.
In the example above, the authors found it convenient to use the same sentence from the Introduction to restate their purpose in the Discussion boldface text. It is important to describe the contribution your study makes to the field and how your findings can be applied to existing and future studies.
How to Write a Discussion Section of a Research Paper The discussion section of a research paper is dedicated to interpretation of your findings and their significance.
A great closing argument can convince the jury that the evidence is sound and the lawyer's interpretation of it has merit. Do not be verbose or repetitive Be concise and make your points clearly Avoid using jargon Follow a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results section [a notable exception is to begin by highlighting an unexpected result or finding] Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past tense If needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into themes II.
Designators such as Tube 1, Tube 2, or Site 1 and Site 2 are completely meaningless out of context and difficult to follow in context. Regardless, a blind administration of the experiment would have been desirable. Addressing potential doubts will save you from painful comments about the wrong interpretation of your results and will present you as a thoughtful and considerate researcher.
Here is some additional advice on particular problems common to new scientific writers. Finally, experimental research should be conducted to test various strategies for preventing examination malpractice to determine which strategies are most effective. Having a list of journal priorities can help you quickly resubmit your paper if your paper is rejected.
References to previous research: What practical steps can educators take to implement the key findings of the research study? As you can see, crucial pieces of information are missing: Using first person can help emphasize a point or illustrate a contrasting finding.
Helping Writers One to One. For example, teachers should instruct their students on how to set goals for their educationlearning as well as instruction on specific study practices such as effectively reading textbooks and studying notes for the exam.
The key here is to be factual and not boastful about what you have done: Continue with drafts After you get enough feedback and decide on the journal you will submit to, the process of real writing begins. Everybody in Nigeria knows that schools need more materials and teachers need higher salaries Draw conclusions and make recommendations that are meaningful, unique, and relate to the results of the study.Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research that it has no relation to other previously published papers.
The discussion section should relate your study findings to. The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section. In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.
That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.
Most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title, Authors and Affiliation, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgments, and Literature Cited, which parallel the experimental process.
This is the system we will use. Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research paper. There are elements of the discussion that. The Discussion section in a scientific paper and the closing argument in a courtroom have similarities.
For many readers, the most important information is not. In this critical part of the research paper, you start the process of explaining any links and correlations apparent in your data.
If you left few interesting leads and open questions in the results section, the discussion is simply a matter of building upon those and expanding them.Download